Archives,
Cover,
2,
3,
4,
5,
6,
7,
8,
9
| |
page 7 |
|
FINDING A NEW PASTOR: BEGINNING THE SEARCH
This is the first of a three part series on the Pastoral Search
Process. It is not intended to be a detailed guide, but to give
an overview of “best practices” on major elements of the search
process for a new minister.
The church’s constituting documents usually give broad
guidelines to church leaders regarding the formation of a
Pastoral or Ministerial Search Committee. The documents may
define who and how many members may serve on the committee, but
seldom give much detail. It is best if the search committee is
representative of the congregation. To whatever extent possible,
each group (age, interest, function) should be represented. The
method for the search itself is most often determined by the
search committee.
The NA’s Division for Ministry (DFM) has developed a “Pastoral
Search Committee Packet” which is available through the NA
office. Contained in the packet are several resources and
articles, a Church Information Form (CIF), a sample Minister’s
Information Form (MIF) and, most importantly, “A Handbook for
Pastoral Search Committees.” This handbook, originally compiled
by the Rev. Phil Jackson, is continually modified to reflect
emerging “best practices.” It offers search committees a time
tested methodology with fairly detailed information about each
step in the process.
In most cases, the first order of business for a newly formed
search committee is to find an interim minister. Interim
ministry has become a specialty. Many who enter it have taken
specialized training to enhance the effectiveness of their
service during this transitional time in the life of a church.
Others rely on their years of experience as a pastor to equip
them for the task. Our office maintains a list of interim
ministers which is available upon request.
One of the most commonly asked questions is if the interim
minister should be allowed to become a candidate for the
permanent position. My answer is always no. There are numerous
reasons why this is not appropriate. I will mention only two.
First, the function of the interim is to prepare the church for
its new pastor. That preparation process will be short
circuited, and it may become self-serving for the interim-as
candidate. Secondly, the search committee will lack objectivity
as it reviews other profiles and interviews other candidates.
Now, having said that, I need also say that pastors who have
served a church as a “fill in” or as “pulpit supply” and even as
an interim minister, have become the settled pastor and some
have had long and meaningful ministries. Regardless, as a “best
practices” method, an interim should not be a candidate for the
permanent position.
At the invitation of a search committee, I am glad to arrange a
meeting with them to offer as many answers as I can. I prefer to
meet in person, but on occasion have met by conference call. It
is best to meet early in the committee’s formation process.
Next month I will touch on best practices for surveying the
congregation and preparing the Church Information Form.
Rev. Dr. Donald P. Olsen
Associate Executive Secretary
|
Archives,
Cover,
2,
3,
4,
5,
6,
7,
8,
9
|